Questions? +1 (202) 335-3939 Login
Trusted News Since 1995
A service for global professionals · Sunday, May 26, 2024 · 714,725,290 Articles · 3+ Million Readers

Clientshare research reveals revenue at risk as poor QBRs cause an increasing number of contract terminations

Clientshare Logo

Showing the front cover of 'The QBR Delusion' whitepaper

'The QBR Delusion' whitepaper

New research reveals how many suppliers are suffering customer churn and loss of revenue as a result of inadequate business review processes.

By implementing a consistent and structured approach to QBRs, suppliers will reduce churn and margin erosion, improve NPS and drive revenue growth.”
— James Ward, Clientshare MD and Founder

LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, January 31, 2024 /EINPresswire.com/ -- 88% of buyer organisations state that suppliers aren’t demonstrating enough evidence of value and innovation in quarterly business reviews (QBRs), and more than three quarters (76%) report that it often feels as though QBRs are merely a tick-box exercise for their suppliers. With 93% of buyers reporting that they are looking at their supplier relationships with much more scrutiny than two years ago, suppliers need to up their game to maintain a competitive edge.

This is according to research published today by Clientshare, the world’s leading business review platform. Buyers of B2B services – including facilities management, logistics, IT services and business process outsourcing – in the UK and US are becoming increasingly disillusioned with suppliers who deliver poor-quality QBRs.

This has a hugely damaging impact on suppliers. More than three quarters (82%) of buyers report they have cancelled a contract because they felt their supplier didn’t deliver enough value and innovation.

As well as customer churn, low-quality QBR processes also result in suppliers missing out on growth within their accounts. 74% of buyers report that suppliers are missing out on key opportunities with their organisations by not making the most of QBRs.

‘The QBR Delusion’ whitepaper reveals the critical importance of QBRs for business relationships, as the number of face-to-face meetings between suppliers and their clients has dramatically declined post pandemic. 68% of buyers point to QBRs (or regular review meetings) as the most important moment for suppliers to evidence their value, share insights and expertise, and create demand for additional services.

James Ward, Managing Director, Clientshare, commented: “The QBR is the best time for suppliers to have meaningful business conversations with their clients. But most are wasting this opportunity and are often damaging their client relationships in these meetings. Customers can see that suppliers are simply going through the motions. They’re turning up with irrelevant and inaccurate content, and they’re overly focused on operational data, looking backwards instead of focusing on the future and helping their clients to address their big strategic challenges.”

As frustrations around QBRs escalate, relationships between buyers and suppliers are deteriorating. 60% of buyers now believe that their suppliers are getting by on delivering the bare minimum, and 79% say the bare minimum is no longer acceptable – they know they have choices and hold the power in their supplier relationships. Moreover, 56% say they don’t trust that suppliers will live up to the promises they made when they first signed the contract.

Claire Fields, Director of Strategic Partnerships, OCS Group UK, stated: “Buyers are now really investing in supplier relationships as they recognise the need to drive as much value as possible from their investments. And that means their expectations are now far higher. Buyers want suppliers to be far more aligned to their business objectives, values and culture and to demonstrate this in review meetings by offering insights, best practice advice and innovation.”

Clientshare’s research highlights the content buyers regard as essential for suppliers to share during QBRs. This includes operational performance data, summaries of how suppliers are addressing client feedback and challenges, strategic initiatives, and opportunities for additional value and innovation. Crucially, buyers also want suppliers to provide clear plans on how to deliver agreed outcomes and key action points following these review meetings.

Significantly, the research reveals that there are major upsides for suppliers that optimise their review processes to meet evolving client needs. Buyers become much more engaged with suppliers that have clear and strong processes around QBRs. For instance, they’re more likely to leave feedback, NPS, and CSAT scores when they feel they are clearly tracked and actioned by a supplier. And, crucially, 74% of buyers state they would definitely be more likely to buy from a supplier that consistently listens to and acts on the feedback they’ve provided.

Ward concluded: “By implementing a consistent and structured approach to QBRs, suppliers will reduce churn and margin erosion, improve NPS and drive revenue growth. Suppliers need to approach QBRs as the most critical moment in their client engagement strategies and, if they can get it right, a way to drive a serious competitive advantage. The key is establishing QBRs as a gateway to meaningful business conversations.”


About Clientshare:

Clientshare is the world's leading Business Reviews platform.

Used by more than one in three of the FTSE 100, Clientshare helps suppliers in Logistics, BPO, FM, Contract Catering and IT to improve retention and grow accounts. The platform gives businesses the tools to create high quality and consistent business reviews, deliver them to the right stakeholders, measure their effectiveness and NPS and act on customer feedback. Customers, including CEVA, Compass Group, SEKO, OCS, CBRE and ISS, use Clientshare to manage client reviews, uncover accounts at risk and identify growth opportunities.

Maria Rangin
Clientshare
2033931991 ext.
email us here
Visit us on social media:
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
YouTube

Powered by EIN Presswire


EIN Presswire does not exercise editorial control over third-party content provided, uploaded, published, or distributed by users of EIN Presswire. We are a distributor, not a publisher, of 3rd party content. Such content may contain the views, opinions, statements, offers, and other material of the respective users, suppliers, participants, or authors.

Submit your press release